I win.

I'm with Spike. I'm more familiar with The Pitt team and I feel they would have a better chance at winning. They did survive a hell-hole.

They are more than a team, they are a family. They would surely win

^Exactly.

Their main challenge would be the Grazers. The rest of it is hands down The Pitt.

Especially since half The City is dead and the DSF is a really small team of people. Plus The Pitt has Alton and Blake.

More importantly they have the eldest son of Kirito Takahashi, Arik the Bamf.

Yeah yeah. They've got Taylor's hands of death.

Hands can be removed.

You try getting a knife that close Taylor's hands. Taylor would either hand of death you still, or Blake would come out of no where. Punching whoever is trying to head off.

Blake is a brawny fighter, not an agile one. It would be simpler to just charge at Taylor, bait out Blake, feint the strike towards Taylor and watch as she is pummeled by the hulk

Taylor is quick...

Arik's smarter.

...I was trying to be realistic... it was the guns part that really got me to pick this one.

Arik carries guns, I believe Alton and Taylor do as well.

Alton has like six swords if memory serves, and Taylor uses a killing glove? and like daggers, oh well she'll correct me if I'm wrong. but the point is that like only two of that team actually has a firearm. Arik and Mark

We got a tank

*had a tank*

I miss the tank... well, Arik can use wind to block the bullets like Neo. Alton can use a shield of water. Blake, under the right weather, can use lightning and wind. Plus he can throw boulders. Taylor can easily stick her hand in the shadow, to the soldier's shadow, grab his ankle and kill him or drop him then take his weapon, as long as it's in the shadows. A bomb can be attached to Devin's arrow which can blow up multiple enemies at once. And Ace, his a son of war.

Water probably the element I use the least now that I think about it. Also I wasn't aware I could stop bullets, not complaining but it's news to me.

Argh I refrain from furthering the argument with my logic of firearms. (Wind won't stop a bullet)

At most it could alter the path of the bullet but even that is stretching it.

Even so the implications of putting such density on the area to increase the air friction to that level would completely immobilize anyone caught within it. So if I was to do that I'd have the alter the area around me, it'd just burn to much energy to be in constant use.

In other illogical news.
link
link

If in close range the round's trajectory would alter little to none, so therefore the wind barrier would have been pointless, now in the case of a tornado in-between the shooter and a target, yes that would alter the trajectory by an amount to miss the target, but it would not stop the bullet.

In any case people think you need to be as fast as a bullet to dodge a bullet. Not true, you just need to to be faster then the arm of shooter.

If I had telekinesis and release a repulsive wave of energy then all would be fine. Sigh.

Which in the end is a lot smarter. The tornado vs altering the shooters aim is like crushing somebody under a pool of diamonds or shooting them.

People don't think they need to be as fast as a bullet to dodge one, h*ll if they are smart enough they wont try to. Now if your up against a shotgun, well... it doesn't matter how quick you are with buckshot. your still gonna get hit.

I'm learning off-hand right now, the most difficult match stance. pain in the arse at 120 meters, and with peep sights on an AR-15A2 it's pretty hard. my favorite stance is kneeling, with a rapid session. aww, that's fun.

My own AR-15 I might add

A shotgun is will have a hard time hitting if the shooter doesn't have a clear shot to his target. It doesn't matter how many pellets you have if they're pointing the wrong way.

Yes that would be if there were obstructions to get away. but...okay how about this: your in an open area, there is a man with a 9mm glock17 with 17 rounds at 20 meters away from you. there is cover about thirty-fourty meters away, would you try? I guarantee you anyone even using a pistol like that would be able to hit a moving target with 17 rounds.

I guarantee you that anyone being fired at with various elemental blasts, environmental disruptions and other guns won't have perfect aim. Besides, Arik goes in with stealth before anything else, can't speak for Blake the hulk and Ace the warspawn of low self-esteem though.

I exaggerated, from my perspective I could kill a person even if they ran like that. I suppose not everyone can do that. but my standing is if your using that weapon, you should at least know how to use it. Any decent shot with a pistol could kill the runner.

II'm being realistic here, I prefer a .40 over a sword any day

Naturally, but the Pitt demigods know a little more then running.

Leon has a perfect aim...lol, I just remembered that

In a normal situation you can't compare a sword-wielder to a gun user if the sword-wielder doesn't also have a gun. However this is not a normal situation.

This is why illusions would be so useful.

I'm not applying this to demigods, I'm talking about real life. people(majority) aren't gonna try and run from a guy with a gun pointed at their face.

Must love to argue spike, no matter what the circumstance

Obviously, but aren't we talking about which team would win?

You're quite good yourself. One of two people on this sight I can say that to. I thought Alex was as well but she seemingly gets offended if you aren't taking her side.

Not me, I start my argument when blaze said arik could stop a bullet with wind.

I don't cry when I lose an argument, I just usually try to end with a point made even while losing. (Not saying you do, sort of toward whoever alex is)

She doesn't cry, she just seems to think that because she is arguing with you it is rude to not let her win. Also I put the word "Sight" in place of "Site" If that is what you're trying to argue then you've won. I believe the phrase is "GG" (Don't worry about it, even if I did think you were saying that I would've investigated first. I've seen the result of jumping the gun.)

I'm a shooter so when someone says something that to me is obviously not realistic to the given situation I tend to let them know

I have certain area's where I do the same thing,

Wasn't arguing that, I was arguing the bullet vs. wind and bullet dodging, nothing else

Well this got off topic, anyway I still think guns are kool XD

And you've won that argument.

There are at that. XD

I usually don't do that, but then again firearms are sort of my thing. Anyways I'm gonna go nice talk spike

These things are a good exercise, but like a game of dodge-ball or whatever it can lose its sweetness when things get too tense.

Wow.

~_~

I just realised I spelt Pitt PItt.

Lol, I never noticed, I think I'm gonna go with the pitt...

Hahaha good choice otherwise I would have had to kill you. ;)

Lol, well dodged a bullet there ;-)

Yup.